FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7049A vs 7072

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7049A and 7072 are both aluminum grades. 7049A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072, about 27 times as much; tensile strength follows at 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). In exchange, 7072 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 7% for 7049A, and 7049A is harder (150 HB vs 20 HB). 7072 is lighter (2.72 g/cm³ vs 2.84 g/cm³ for 7049A) and 7072 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 7049A machines more easily (good vs poor), 7072 welds better (very good vs not recommended), and 7072 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 7049A (high, $$$$).

7049AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7072Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

7049A vs 7072: properties

7049A7072

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

640 MPa92.8 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

7%
32%

Reduction in Area

14%
—

Compressive Strength

585 MPa84.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

370 MPa53.7 ksi
41 MPa5.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

160 MPa23.2 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
20 HB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

477°C891 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
227 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

37 % IACS
60 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.66×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.83 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.96 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
30%

Weldability

12 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

18 / 100
95 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

10 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

8%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

225 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,288 kJ/m³
3 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

53.2 mm²/s
92.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

56
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70727049A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability7049A7072
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7049A vs 7072 — frequently asked

Is 7049A stronger than 7072?

Yes. 7049A has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072 — about 27 times as much. Tensile strength is 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7049A or 7072?

7072 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 7049A is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7049A or 7072?

7049A. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against poor (30/100) for 7072; for welding the order is 7072 first (very good, 80/100) then 7049A (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7049A and 7072 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.