FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 7022 vs 7072

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 7022 and 7072 are both aluminum grades. 7022 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072, about 22 times as much; tensile strength follows at 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi). In exchange, 7072 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 8% for 7022, and 7022 is harder (150 HB vs 20 HB). 7072 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 7072 conducts heat better (227 W/m·K vs 145 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 7022 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 7072 welds better (very good vs poor), and 7072 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 7022 (premium, $$$).

7022Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

7072Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

7022 vs 7072: properties

70227072

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
32%

Reduction in Area

18%
—

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
41 MPa5.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
20 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

475°C887 °F
640°C1,184 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
227 W/m·K131 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.5 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
60 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.96 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

300%
30%

Weldability

20 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
95 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

191 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,578 kJ/m³
3 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

60.3 mm²/s
92.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

47
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale70727022

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability70227072
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

7022 vs 7072 — frequently asked

Is 7022 stronger than 7072?

Yes. 7022 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for 7072 — about 22 times as much. Tensile strength is 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 55 MPa (7.98 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 7022 or 7072?

7072 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 7022 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 7022 or 7072?

7022. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against poor (30/100) for 7072; for welding the order is 7072 first (very good, 80/100) then 7022 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 7022 and 7072 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.