FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6020 vs 6262

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6020 and 6262 are both aluminum grades, both machining-friendly al. 6020 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 6262, about 5% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). 6020 is harder — 100 HB against 95 HB for 6262 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

6020Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6020 vs 6262: properties

60206262

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
12%

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

26 MPa·√m23.7 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

108 HV
105 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

585°C1,085 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Liquidus Temperature

650°C1,202 °F
652°C1,206 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
172 W/m·K99.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

42 % IACS
44 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.61 µΩ·in
3.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.54 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.8 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 180% · Formability (cold) 35 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

122 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

609 kJ/m³
548 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

70.3 mm²/s
70.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
33

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale60206262

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability60206262
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6020 vs 6262 — frequently asked

Is 6020 stronger than 6262?

Yes. 6020 has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for 6262 — about 5% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6020 or 6262?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 6020 or 6262?

6262. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for 6020.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6020 and 6262 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.