FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6360

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6360 are both aluminum grades. 6005A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for 6360, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). 6005A is harder — 95 HB against 75 HB for 6360 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 6360 forms better (good vs fair) and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6360 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

6005A vs 6360: properties

6005A6360

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
80 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 11%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
653°C1,207 °F

Same in both: Density 2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.4 µm/m·K13 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 393 J/g169 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.25×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 190% · Weldability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
262 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
82.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
28

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6360

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6360
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

6005A vs 6360 — frequently asked

Is 6005A stronger than 6360?

Yes. 6005A has a typical yield strength of 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for 6360 — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6360?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6360 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 6005A or 6360?

6005A, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for 6360.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6360 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.