FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 6005A vs 6201

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 6005A and 6201 are both aluminum grades. 6201 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi). In exchange, 6005A is the more ductile: elongation 11% versus 4% for 6201, and 6201 is harder (100 HB vs 95 HB). 6005A runs hotter in service (150°C vs 90°C continuous). On the shop floor, 6005A welds better (excellent vs good) and 6005A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 6201 (standard, $$).

6005AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

6201Choose it when strength drives the design.

6005A vs 6201: properties

6005A6201

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69.5 GPa10.1 Msi
68.9 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
4%

Compressive Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

100 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 29 MPa·√m26.4 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 607°C1,125 °F · Liquidus Temperature 654°C1,209 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F
205 W/m·K118 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

897 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
895 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-80°C-112 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

49 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.38 µΩ·in
3.25×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

190%
—

Weldability

85 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
123 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.7 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

397 kJ/m³
697 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

78.5 mm²/s
85.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
43

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6005A6201

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6005A6201
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

6005A vs 6201 — frequently asked

Is 6201 stronger than 6005A?

Yes. 6201 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for 6005A — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 275 MPa (39.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6005A or 6201?

6005A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 6201 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 6005A or 6201?

6005A. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against good (62/100) for 6201.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6005A and 6201 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.