FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5052 vs 5657

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5052 and 5657 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 5052 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 5657, about 39% more; tensile strength follows at 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi). 5052 is harder — 60 HB against 40 HB for 5657 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 5052 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 5657 conducts heat better (176 W/m·K vs 138 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5052 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 5052 welds better (excellent vs very good).

5052Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

5052 vs 5657: properties

50525657

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Shear Strength

138 MPa20 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

117 MPa17 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
40 HB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Liquidus Temperature

649°C1,200 °F
657°C1,215 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
176 W/m·K102 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
395 J/g170 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
54 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in
3.19×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.26 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
35%

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
12%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

270 kJ/m³
142 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.5 mm²/s
72.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525657

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50525657
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5052 vs 5657 — frequently asked

Is 5052 stronger than 5657?

Yes. 5052 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for 5657 — about 39% more. Tensile strength is 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) vs 160 MPa (23.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5657?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5657?

5052. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (30/100) for 5657; for welding the order is 5052 first (excellent, 90/100) then 5657 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5657 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.