FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 5052 vs 5383

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 5052 and 5383 are both aluminum grades. 5383 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for 5052, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi). 5383 is harder — 95 HB against 60 HB for 5052 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 5052 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 65°C continuous) and 5052 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 117 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 5052 forms better (very good vs good) and 5052 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 5383 (standard, $$).

5052Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

5383Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

5052 vs 5383: properties

50525383

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

70.3 GPa10.2 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

25.9 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
13%

Shear Strength

138 MPa20 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

117 MPa17 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
60 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.66 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

607°C1,125 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

649°C1,200 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
117 W/m·K67.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
24.2 µm/m·K13.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

393 J/g169 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

35 % IACS
29 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.93×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.94 µΩ·in
5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.85 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
124 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.2 MN·m/kg
26.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

270 kJ/m³
341 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.5 mm²/s
48.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale50525383

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability50525383
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

5052 vs 5383 — frequently asked

Is 5383 stronger than 5052?

Yes. 5383 has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for 5052 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 230 MPa (33.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 5052 or 5383?

5052 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 5383 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 5052 or 5383?

5052, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 5383.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 5052 and 5383 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.