FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 357 vs 380

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 357 and 380 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. 357 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) for 380, about 72% more. 357 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 380, and 357 is harder (90 HB vs 80 HB). 357 conducts heat better (152 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 357 welds better (excellent vs poor) and 380 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 357 (standard, $$).

357Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

380Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

357 vs 380: properties

357380

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
325 MPa47.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
3%

Compressive Strength

280 MPa40.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

225 MPa32.6 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
80 HB

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.68 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

557°C1,035 °F
540°C1,004 °F

Liquidus Temperature

613°C1,135 °F
595°C1,103 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.8 µm/m·K12.1 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

39 % IACS
24 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.83 V
-0.79 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
—

Castability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
130%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
10.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
90%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
118 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

525 kJ/m³
180 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.9 mm²/s
36.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale357380

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability357380
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

357 vs 380 — frequently asked

Is 357 stronger than 380?

Yes. 357 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 160 MPa (23.2 ksi) for 380 — about 72% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 325 MPa (47.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 357 or 380?

380 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 357 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 357 or 380?

357. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (25/100) for 380.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 357 and 380 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.