FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs ZL401

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and ZL401 are both aluminum grades. ZL401 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). ZL401 is harder — 85 HB against 70 HB for 319 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 319 is lighter (2.79 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for ZL401) and 319 is stiffer (74 GPa vs 70 GPa). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL401 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

ZL401Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

319 vs ZL401: properties

319ZL401

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
85 HB

Reduction in Area

—
3%

Compressive Strength

—
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
52 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
89 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 2% · Shear Strength 150 MPa21.8 ksi · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 4 J3 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
125 W/m·K72.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
24 µm/m·K13.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
380 J/g163 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.9 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
43 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
72%

Weldability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
23.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
219 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
48.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319ZL401

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319ZL401
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs ZL401 — frequently asked

Is ZL401 stronger than 319?

Yes. ZL401 has a typical yield strength of 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or ZL401?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL401 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or ZL401?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for ZL401; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then ZL401 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and ZL401 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.