FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs ZL201

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and ZL201 are both aluminum grades. ZL201 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 106% more; tensile strength follows at 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). ZL201 is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2% for 319, and ZL201 is harder (90 HB vs 70 HB). 319 is stiffer (74 GPa vs 70 GPa) and ZL201 conducts heat better (130 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 welds better (good vs poor) and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL201 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ZL201Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs ZL201: properties

319ZL201

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
6%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
90 HB

Compressive Strength

—
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.83 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
545°C1,013 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.68 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
300%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
124 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
464 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
52.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
29

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319ZL201

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319ZL201
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs ZL201 — frequently asked

Is ZL201 stronger than 319?

Yes. ZL201 has a typical yield strength of 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 106% more. Tensile strength is 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or ZL201?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL201 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 319 or ZL201?

319. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (25/100) for ZL201.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and ZL201 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.