FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs ZL111

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and ZL111 are both aluminum grades. ZL111 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 102% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). ZL111 is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2% for 319, and ZL111 is harder (100 HB vs 70 HB). 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and ZL111 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), 319 welds better (good vs fair), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL111 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZL111Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs ZL111: properties

319ZL111

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
2.5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
100 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
525°C977 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
430 J/g185 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
42 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
60%

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
121 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
434 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
52.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
29

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319ZL111

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319ZL111
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs ZL111 — frequently asked

Is ZL111 stronger than 319?

Yes. ZL111 has a typical yield strength of 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 102% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or ZL111?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL111 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or ZL111?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for ZL111; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then ZL111 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and ZL111 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.