FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs ZL104

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and ZL104 are both aluminum grades. ZL104 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). ZL104 is the more ductile: elongation 3% versus 2% for 319, and ZL104 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). ZL104 is lighter (2.65 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), ZL104 welds better (very good vs good), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ZL104 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZL104Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs ZL104: properties

319ZL104

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
3%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
175 MPa25.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.65 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
557°C1,035 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
596°C1,105 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
400 J/g172 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
33 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
90%

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Castability 90 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
282 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
56.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319ZL104

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319ZL104
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs ZL104 — frequently asked

Is ZL104 stronger than 319?

Yes. ZL104 has a typical yield strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or ZL104?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ZL104 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or ZL104?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for ZL104; for welding the order is ZL104 first (very good, 70/100) then 319 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and ZL104 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.