FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs A357

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and A357 are both aluminum grades, both cast al. A357 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 123% more; tensile strength follows at 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). A357 is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2% for 319, and A357 is harder (100 HB vs 70 HB). A357 is lighter (2.67 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, A357 welds better (very good vs good) and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A357 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A357Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs A357: properties

319A357

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
276 MPa40 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
6%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
100 HB

Compressive Strength

—
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.67 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
555°C1,031 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
613°C1,135 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
39 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
70%

Weldability

55 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
129 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
529 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
59.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
34

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319A357

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319A357
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

319 vs A357 — frequently asked

Is A357 stronger than 319?

Yes. A357 has a typical yield strength of 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 123% more. Tensile strength is 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or A357?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A357 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or A357?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for A357; for welding the order is A357 first (very good, 75/100) then 319 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and A357 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.