FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 710.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 710.0 are both aluminum grades. 710.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). 710.0 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 2% for 319, and 710.0 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 710.0 conducts heat better (142 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 710.0 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 710.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

710.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs 710.0: properties

319710.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
5%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
79 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
142 W/m·K82 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
960 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
35 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
4.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.93 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.96 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
48 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
7 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

75%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
204 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
52.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
20

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319710.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319710.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 710.0 — frequently asked

Is 710.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 710.0 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 710.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 710.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 710.0?

710.0. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (72/100) for 319; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 710.0 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 710.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.