FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 520.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 520.0 are both aluminum grades. 520.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 45% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). 520.0 is the more ductile: elongation 16% versus 2% for 319, and 520.0 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). 520.0 is lighter (2.57 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 is stiffer (74 GPa vs 68 GPa). On the shop floor, 520.0 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 520.0 (premium, $$$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

520.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

319 vs 520.0: properties

319520.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
68 GPa9.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
25.5 GPa3.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
67 GPa9.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
16%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.57 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
449°C840 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
599°C1,110 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
87 W/m·K50.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
21 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
8.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.23 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.89 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
300%

Weldability

55 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
—

Castability

90 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
128 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
238 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
35.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
17

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319520.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319520.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 520.0 — frequently asked

Is 520.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 520.0 has a typical yield strength of 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 45% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 520.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 520.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 520.0?

520.0. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (72/100) for 319; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 520.0 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 520.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.