FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 392.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 392.0 are both aluminum grades. 392.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 106% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0.8% for 392.0, and 392.0 is harder (100 HB vs 70 HB). 392.0 is lighter (2.64 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 392.0 is stiffer (82 GPa vs 74 GPa). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs poor), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 392.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

392.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

319 vs 392.0: properties

319392.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
82 GPa11.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
31 GPa4.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
0.8%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
108 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.64 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
574°C1,065 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
649°C1,200 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
425 J/g183 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-195°C-319 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
31.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
396 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
52.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
27

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319392.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319392.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 392.0 — frequently asked

Is 392.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 392.0 has a typical yield strength of 255 MPa (37 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 106% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 392.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 392.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 392.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against poor (25/100) for 392.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 392.0 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 392.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.