FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 344.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 344.0 are both aluminum grades. 344.0 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 319, about 18% more. 344.0 is harder — 85 HB against 70 HB for 319 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), 319 welds better (good vs fair), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 344.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

344.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

319 vs 344.0: properties

319344.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
85 HB

Compressive Strength

—
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 74 GPa10.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 2% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 4 J3 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 521°C970 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
70%

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
155 MJ/kg66,638 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
80 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
106 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
41.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319344.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319344.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 344.0 — frequently asked

Is 344.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 344.0 has a typical tensile strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 186 MPa (27 ksi) for 319 — about 18% more.

Which is cheaper, 319 or 344.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 344.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 344.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (55/100) for 344.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 344.0 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 344.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.