FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 339.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 339.0 are both aluminum grades. 339.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 276 MPa (40 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for 339.0, and 339.0 is harder (100 HB vs 70 HB). 339.0 is stiffer (81 GPa vs 74 GPa) and 339.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs fair), 319 welds better (good vs poor), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 339.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

339.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

319 vs 339.0: properties

319339.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
276 MPa40 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
234 MPa33.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
100 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
505°C941 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
580°C1,076 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
19.4 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
490 J/g211 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
28 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.44 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.75 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
55%

Weldability

55 / 100
22 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
18 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
101 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
29.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
338 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
45.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319339.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319339.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 339.0 — frequently asked

Is 339.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 339.0 has a typical yield strength of 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 276 MPa (40 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 339.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 339.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 339.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (40/100) for 339.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 339.0 (poor, 22/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 339.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.