FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 331.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 331.0 are both aluminum grades. 331.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for 331.0, and 331.0 is harder (95 HB vs 70 HB). 331.0 is stiffer (79 GPa vs 74 GPa). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs fair), 319 welds better (good vs fair), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 331.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

331.0Choose it when strength drives the design.

319 vs 331.0: properties

319331.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

69 MPa10 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
95 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.72 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

521°C970 °F
538°C1,000 °F

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
582°C1,080 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

389 J/g167 BTU/lb
460 J/g198 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.8 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
40%

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Castability 90 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
29 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
42 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319331.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319331.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 331.0 — frequently asked

Is 331.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 331.0 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 331.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 331.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 331.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against fair (40/100) for 331.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 331.0 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 331.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.