FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 319 vs 328.0

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 319 and 328.0 are both aluminum grades. 328.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for 328.0, and 328.0 is harder (75 HB vs 70 HB). 328.0 is lighter (2.7 g/cm³ vs 2.79 g/cm³ for 319) and 319 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous). On the shop floor, 319 machines more easily (very good vs good), 319 welds better (good vs fair), and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 328.0 (standard, $$).

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

328.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

319 vs 328.0: properties

319328.0

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

27.5 GPa4 Msi
26.5 GPa3.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

186 MPa27 ksi
234 MPa33.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
148 MPa21.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1%

Shear Strength

150 MPa21.8 ksi
179 MPa26 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

4 J3 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 69 MPa10 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

604°C1,119 °F
610°C1,130 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 521°C970 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F
126 W/m·K72.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
22 µm/m·K12.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.78 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
—

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
185 MJ/kg79,536 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

67 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

104 kJ/m³
154 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

40.6 mm²/s
48.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319328.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability319328.0
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

319 vs 328.0 — frequently asked

Is 328.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 328.0 has a typical yield strength of 148 MPa (21.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 319 or 328.0?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 328.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 319 or 328.0?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (60/100) for 328.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 328.0 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 319 and 328.0 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.