FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 242.0 vs 319

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 242.0 and 319 are both aluminum grades. 242.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 207 MPa (30 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 221 MPa (32.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 0.5% for 242.0, and 242.0 is harder (85 HB vs 70 HB). 242.0 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous) and 242.0 conducts heat better (130 W/m·K vs 109 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 welds better (good vs poor) and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 242.0 (standard, $$).

242.0Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

242.0 vs 319: properties

242.0319

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
27.5 GPa4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

221 MPa32.1 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

207 MPa30 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
2%

Shear Strength

179 MPa26 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
69 MPa10 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

17 MPa·√m15.5 ksi·√in
19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J1.8 ft·lbf
4 J3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
70 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

528°C982 °F
521°C970 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
604°C1,119 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

921 J/kg·K0.22 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.01 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.72 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

22 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

48 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
130%

Same in both: Machinability 72 / 100 · Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

302 kJ/m³
104 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

50.2 mm²/s
40.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319242.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability242.0319
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

242.0 vs 319 — frequently asked

Is 242.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 242.0 has a typical yield strength of 207 MPa (30 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 221 MPa (32.1 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 242.0 or 319?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 242.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 242.0 or 319?

319. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (22/100) for 242.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 242.0 and 319 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.