FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 240.0 vs 319

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 240.0 and 319 are both aluminum grades. 240.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1% for 240.0, and 240.0 is harder (90 HB vs 70 HB). 319 conducts heat better (109 W/m·K vs 96 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 319 welds better (good vs poor) and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 240.0 (premium, $$$).

240.0Choose it when strength drives the design.

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

240.0 vs 319: properties

240.0319

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.5 GPa3.8 Msi
27.5 GPa4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

200 MPa29 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
2%

Compressive Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
—

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
70 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 69 MPa10 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.78 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

516°C961 °F
521°C970 °F

Liquidus Temperature

605°C1,121 °F
604°C1,119 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

96 W/m·K55.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

23 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.72 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
130%

Weldability

20 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

195 MJ/kg83,835 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

84 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

282 kJ/m³
104 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39.2 mm²/s
40.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319240.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability240.0319
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

240.0 vs 319 — frequently asked

Is 240.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 240.0 has a typical yield strength of 200 MPa (29 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 240.0 or 319?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 240.0 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 240.0 or 319?

319. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for 240.0; for welding the order is 319 first (good, 55/100) then 240.0 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 240.0 and 319 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.