FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 238.0 vs 319

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 238.0 and 319 are both aluminum grades. 238.0 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 207 MPa (30 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi). In exchange, 319 is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1.5% for 238.0, and 238.0 is harder (100 HB vs 70 HB). 319 is lighter (2.79 g/cm³ vs 2.95 g/cm³ for 238.0). On the shop floor, 319 welds better (good vs poor) and 319 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 238.0 (standard, $$).

238.0Choose it when strength drives the design.

319Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

238.0 vs 319: properties

238.0319

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
27.5 GPa4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

207 MPa30 ksi
186 MPa27 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
2%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
70 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
19 MPa·√m17.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
4 J3 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 69 MPa10 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.95 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

510°C950 °F
521°C970 °F

Liquidus Temperature

599°C1,110 °F
604°C1,119 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
109 W/m·K63 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21.4 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F
21.5 µm/m·K11.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 963 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 389 J/g167 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

25 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

22 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 72 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 130% · Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
67 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

189 kJ/m³
104 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

35.2 mm²/s
40.6 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale319238.0

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability238.0319
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Anodizing Type II—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chem Film (Alodine)—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE—Yes
Hard Anodizing Type III—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Powder Coating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

238.0 vs 319 — frequently asked

Is 238.0 stronger than 319?

Yes. 238.0 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for 319 — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 207 MPa (30 ksi) vs 186 MPa (27 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 238.0 or 319?

319 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 238.0 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 238.0 or 319?

319. Its weldability rates good (55/100) against poor (22/100) for 238.0.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 238.0 and 319 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.