FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2011A-T3 vs 2011A-T4

Aluminum · 2011A temper comparison

2011A-T3 and 2011A-T4 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2011A: T3 (solution heat treated, cold worked and naturally aged) versus T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2011A-T3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) for 2011A-T4, about 37% more; tensile strength follows at 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). In exchange, 2011A-T4 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for 2011A-T3, and 2011A-T3 is harder (95 HB vs 85 HB).

2011A-T3Choose it when strength drives the design.

2011A-T4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2011A-T3 vs 2011A-T4: properties

2011A-T32011A-T4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
18%

Shear Strength

220 MPa31.9 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
52 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Vickers 105 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.83 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 535°C995 °F · Liquidus Temperature 643°C1,189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 152 W/m·K87.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 22.9 µm/m·K12.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 39 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.73 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.72 V · Corrosion Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

99 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

22 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 300% · Weldability 10 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 10 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2011A

2011A-T3 vs 2011A-T4 — frequently asked

Is 2011A-T3 stronger than 2011A-T4?

Yes. 2011A-T3 has a typical yield strength of 295 MPa (42.8 ksi) against 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) for 2011A-T4 — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, T3 or T4?

T3 is the default 2011A condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

When should I choose 2011A-T3 over 2011A-T4?

Pick 2011A-T3 when strength drives the design. Pick 2011A-T4 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2011A-T3 and 2011A-T4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.