Aluminum 2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T8
Aluminum · 2009/SiC/15p temper comparison
2009/SiC/15p-O and 2009/SiC/15p-T8 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2009/SiC/15p: O (annealed) versus T8 (solution heat treated, cold worked and artificially aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2009/SiC/15p-T8 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, 2009/SiC/15p-O is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 4% for 2009/SiC/15p-T8, and 2009/SiC/15p-T8 is harder (155 HB vs 75 HB). 2009/SiC/15p-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 2009/SiC/15p-O conducts electricity better (40 % IACS vs 33 % IACS).
2009/SiC/15p-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
2009/SiC/15p-T8Choose it when strength drives the design.
2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T8: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all aluminum grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 98 GPa14.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 38 GPa5.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 82 GPa11.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 502°C936 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 330 J/g142 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.68 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 16 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 2%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T8 — frequently asked
Is 2009/SiC/15p-T8 stronger than 2009/SiC/15p-O?
Yes. 2009/SiC/15p-T8 has a typical yield strength of 515 MPa (74.7 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).
Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T8?
T4 is the default 2009/SiC/15p condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither O nor T8). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.
Which welds better, 2009/SiC/15p-O or 2009/SiC/15p-T8?
2009/SiC/15p-O. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for 2009/SiC/15p-T8.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2009/SiC/15p-O and 2009/SiC/15p-T8 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.