FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2009/SiC/15p-F vs 2009/SiC/15p-O

Aluminum · 2009/SiC/15p temper comparison

2009/SiC/15p-F and 2009/SiC/15p-O are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2009/SiC/15p: F (as fabricated) versus O (annealed). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2009/SiC/15p-F is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O, about 88% more; tensile strength follows at 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, 2009/SiC/15p-O is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for 2009/SiC/15p-F, and 2009/SiC/15p-F is harder (110 HB vs 75 HB). 2009/SiC/15p-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 2009/SiC/15p-O conducts heat better (175 W/m·K vs 155 W/m·K).

2009/SiC/15p-FChoose it when strength drives the design.

2009/SiC/15p-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2009/SiC/15p-F vs 2009/SiC/15p-O: properties

2009/SiC/15p-F2009/SiC/15p-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
12%

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Shear Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in
28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
9 J6.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
32 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 98 GPa14.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 38 GPa5.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 82 GPa11.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 502°C936 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 330 J/g142 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

33 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.05 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.68 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
9%

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 15 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 16 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 2%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2009/SiC/15p

2009/SiC/15p-F vs 2009/SiC/15p-O — frequently asked

Is 2009/SiC/15p-F stronger than 2009/SiC/15p-O?

Yes. 2009/SiC/15p-F has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O — about 88% more. Tensile strength is 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, F or O?

T4 is the default 2009/SiC/15p condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither F nor O). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which welds better, 2009/SiC/15p-F or 2009/SiC/15p-O?

2009/SiC/15p-O. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for 2009/SiC/15p-F.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2009/SiC/15p-F and 2009/SiC/15p-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.