FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T4

Aluminum · 2009/SiC/15p temper comparison

2009/SiC/15p-O and 2009/SiC/15p-T4 are two conditions of the same aluminum grade, 2009/SiC/15p: O (annealed) versus T4 (solution heat treated and naturally aged). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 2009/SiC/15p-T4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O, about 115% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, 2009/SiC/15p-O is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 7% for 2009/SiC/15p-T4, and 2009/SiC/15p-T4 is harder (125 HB vs 75 HB). 2009/SiC/15p-O runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2009/SiC/15p-O conducts heat better (175 W/m·K vs 145 W/m·K).

2009/SiC/15p-OChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2009/SiC/15p-T4Choose it when strength drives the design.

2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T4: properties

2009/SiC/15p-O2009/SiC/15p-T4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
365 MPa52.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
7%

Compressive Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in
25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

9 J6.6 ft·lbf
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

75 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

32 HRB
80 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 98 GPa14.2 Msi · Shear Modulus 38 GPa5.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 82 GPa11.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 2.84 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 502°C936 °F · Liquidus Temperature 638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 330 J/g142 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
32 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.68 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

9%
10%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 15 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 20 / 100 · Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 16 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 2%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2009/SiC/15p

2009/SiC/15p-O vs 2009/SiC/15p-T4 — frequently asked

Is 2009/SiC/15p-T4 stronger than 2009/SiC/15p-O?

Yes. 2009/SiC/15p-T4 has a typical yield strength of 365 MPa (52.9 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for 2009/SiC/15p-O — about 115% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, O or T4?

T4 is the default 2009/SiC/15p condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which welds better, 2009/SiC/15p-O or 2009/SiC/15p-T4?

2009/SiC/15p-O. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for 2009/SiC/15p-T4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2009/SiC/15p-O and 2009/SiC/15p-T4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.