FabDigitFabDigit

Zinc Alloy Slush Metal vs Zinc Anode Alloy

Zinc Alloy · grade comparison

Zinc Alloy Slush Metal and Zinc Anode Alloy are both zinc alloy grades. Slush Metal is the stronger of the two: yield strength 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for Zinc Anode Alloy, about 160% more; tensile strength follows at 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 80 MPa (11.6 ksi). In exchange, Zinc Anode Alloy is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 3% for Slush Metal, and Slush Metal is harder (70 HB vs 38 HB). Slush Metal is lighter (6.6 g/cm³ vs 7.13 g/cm³ for Zinc Anode Alloy) and Zinc Anode Alloy is stiffer (100 GPa vs 85 GPa). On the shop floor, Slush Metal sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Zinc Anode Alloy (premium, $$$).

Slush MetalChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Zinc Anode AlloyChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Slush Metal vs Zinc Anode Alloy: properties

Slush MetalZinc Anode Alloy

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

85 GPa12.3 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

33 GPa4.8 Msi
40 GPa5.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

68 GPa9.9 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
8%

Reduction in Area

4%
—

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

70 HB
38 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

35 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

73 HV
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

6.6 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³
7.13 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

380°C716 °F
419°C786 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 420°C788 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
390 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

27.4 µm/m·K15.2 µin/in·°F
30.5 µm/m·K16.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

110 J/g47.3 BTU/lb
112 J/g48.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
50°C122 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 110 W/m·K63.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

27 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-1 V
-1.03 V

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 70%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
8%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
14 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

99 kJ/m³
13 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

39.7 mm²/s
39.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every zinc alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

205010020055.566.57Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSlush MetalZinc Anode Alloy

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySlush MetalZinc Anode Alloy
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Copper Plating.

Slush Metal vs Zinc Anode Alloy — frequently asked

Is Slush Metal stronger than Zinc Anode Alloy?

Yes. Slush Metal has a typical yield strength of 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) against 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) for Zinc Anode Alloy — about 160% more. Tensile strength is 180 MPa (26.1 ksi) vs 80 MPa (11.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Slush Metal or Zinc Anode Alloy?

Slush Metal is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Zinc Anode Alloy is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Slush Metal or Zinc Anode Alloy?

Zinc Anode Alloy. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against poor (15/100) for Slush Metal.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Slush Metal and Zinc Anode Alloy side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.