FabDigitFabDigit

Tungsten Alloy W (99.95% CP Tungsten) vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)

Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison

Tungsten Alloy W (99.95% CP Tungsten) and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) are both tungsten alloy grades. WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,900 MPa (276 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for W (99.95% CP Tungsten), about 153% more; tensile strength follows at 2,200 MPa (319 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi). WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is the more ductile: elongation 2.5% versus 2% for W (99.95% CP Tungsten), and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) is harder (455 HB vs 415 HB). WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) runs hotter in service (2,000°C vs 1,200°C continuous).

WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

W (99.95% CP Tungsten) vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten): properties

W (99.95% CP Tungsten)WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

950 MPa138 ksi
2,200 MPa319 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

750 MPa109 ksi
1,900 MPa276 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
2.5%

Reduction in Area

3%
35%

Compressive Strength

1,400 MPa203 ksi
2,200 MPa319 ksi

Shear Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
2 J1.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

415 HB
455 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

39 HRC
48 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

440 HV
480 HV

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
800 MPa116 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 400 GPa58 Msi · Shear Modulus 156 GPa22.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 310 GPa45 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

19.25 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³
19.3 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 3,422°C6,192 °F · Liquidus Temperature 3,422°C6,192 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

173 W/m·K100 BTU/hr·ft·°F
168 W/m·K97.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,200°C2,192 °F
2,000°C3,632 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 132 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 192 J/g82.5 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature 20°C68 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.17 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 31 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
8%

Weldability

12 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

3 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

27 kg CO₂/kg
22 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
114 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.8 MN·m/kg
20.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

703 kJ/m³
4,513 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

68.1 mm²/s
65.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

91
205

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,500141516171819Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleW (99.95% CP Tungsten)WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityW (99.95% CP Tungsten)WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

W (99.95% CP Tungsten) vs WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) — frequently asked

Is WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) stronger than W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?

Yes. WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) has a typical yield strength of 1,900 MPa (276 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for W (99.95% CP Tungsten) — about 153% more. Tensile strength is 2,200 MPa (319 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi).

Which is cheaper, W (99.95% CP Tungsten) or WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose W (99.95% CP Tungsten) over WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten)?

Pick WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in W (99.95% CP Tungsten) and WVMA (Doped Non-Sag Tungsten) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.