FabDigitFabDigit

Tungsten Alloy W-25Re vs W80Cu20

Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison

Tungsten Alloy W-25Re and W80Cu20 are both tungsten alloy grades. W-25Re is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,850 MPa (268 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for W80Cu20, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,100 MPa (305 ksi) vs 630 MPa (91.4 ksi). W-25Re is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 3% for W80Cu20, and W-25Re is harder (620 HV vs 215 HV). W80Cu20 is lighter (15.25 g/cm³ vs 19.7 g/cm³ for W-25Re) and W-25Re is stiffer (400 GPa vs 260 GPa). On the shop floor, W80Cu20 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and W-25Re welds better (fair vs not recommended).

W-25ReChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

W80Cu20Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

W-25Re vs W80Cu20: properties

W-25ReW80Cu20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

400 GPa58 Msi
260 GPa37.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

310 GPa45 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,100 MPa305 ksi
630 MPa91.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,850 MPa268 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

4%
3%

Reduction in Area

30%
4%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

700 MPa102 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

25 MPa·√m22.8 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

620 HV
215 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Shear Strength

—
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
5 J3.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
205 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
98 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
18 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

19.7 g/cm³0.71 lb/in³
15.25 g/cm³0.55 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,000°C5,432 °F
1,083°C1,981 °F

Liquidus Temperature

3,080°C5,576 °F
3,410°C6,170 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
190 W/m·K110 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
180 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.6 µm/m·K2.6 µin/in·°F
8.3 µm/m·K4.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

185 J/g79.5 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

2,400°C4,352 °F
500°C932 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.7 % IACS
34 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.8 µΩ·in
5.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.01 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.22 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

5%
20%

Weldability

45 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
5 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

750 MJ/kg322,442 BTU/lb
190 MJ/kg81,685 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

55 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Water 400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.3 MN·m/kg
17 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4,278 kJ/m³
425 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

16.3 mm²/s
69.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
55

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,500141516171819Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleW-25ReW80Cu20

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityW-25ReW80Cu20
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

W-25Re vs W80Cu20 — frequently asked

Is W-25Re stronger than W80Cu20?

Yes. W-25Re has a typical yield strength of 1,850 MPa (268 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for W80Cu20 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,100 MPa (305 ksi) vs 630 MPa (91.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, W-25Re or W80Cu20?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, W-25Re or W80Cu20?

W80Cu20. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (8/100) for W-25Re; for welding the order is W-25Re first (fair, 45/100) then W80Cu20 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in W-25Re and W80Cu20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.