FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Ti-6-22-22 vs Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Ti-6-22-22 and Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn are both titanium grades. Ti-6-22-22 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,160 MPa (168 ksi) against 980 MPa (142 ksi) for Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 1,050 MPa (152 ksi). In exchange, Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 10% for Ti-6-22-22, and Ti-6-22-22 is harder (38 HRC vs 36 HRC). Ti-6-22-22 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, Ti-6-22-22 welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100).

Ti-6-22-22Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

Ti-6Al-6V-2SnChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ti-6-22-22 vs Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn: properties

Ti-6-22-22Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
42.5 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,240 MPa180 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,160 MPa168 ksi
980 MPa142 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
14%

Reduction in Area

25%
30%

Compressive Strength

1,240 MPa180 ksi
1,010 MPa146 ksi

Shear Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
19 J14 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

38 HRC
36 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

375 HV
355 HV

Hardness, Brinell

—
340 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.54 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,590°C2,894 °F
1,690°C3,074 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,705°C3,101 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
6.6 W/m·K3.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F
9.1 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 365 J/g157 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 315°C599 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in
1.57×10⁻⁶ Ω·m61.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

16 / 100
17 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
20%

Weldability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

18 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
690 MJ/kg296,647 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

267 kN·m/kg
231 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,750 kJ/m³
4,365 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-6Al-6V-2SnTi-6-22-22

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTi-6-22-22Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Ti-6-22-22 vs Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn — frequently asked

Is Ti-6-22-22 stronger than Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn?

Yes. Ti-6-22-22 has a typical yield strength of 1,160 MPa (168 ksi) against 980 MPa (142 ksi) for Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 1,050 MPa (152 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ti-6-22-22 or Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, Ti-6-22-22 or Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn?

Ti-6-22-22. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (35/100) for Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ti-6-22-22 and Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.