FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 3 vs Ti Grade 35

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 3 and Ti Grade 35 are both titanium grades. Ti Grade 35 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 920 MPa (133 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3, about 119% more; tensile strength follows at 990 MPa (144 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi). In exchange, Grade 3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 16% for Ti Grade 35, and Ti Grade 35 is harder (315 HB vs 200 HB). Ti Grade 35 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa) and Ti Grade 35 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 3 machines more easily (fair vs poor), Grade 3 welds better (excellent vs very good), and Ti Grade 35 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Grade 3 (specialty, $$$$$).

Grade 3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti Grade 35Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 3 vs Ti Grade 35: properties

Grade 3Ti Grade 35

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
990 MPa144 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
920 MPa133 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
16%

Reduction in Area

35%
40%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

24 J17.7 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
315 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
330 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
33 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.54 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,590°C2,894 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,668°C3,034 °F
1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.4 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
530 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
20%

Weldability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

690 MJ/kg296,647 BTU/lb
680 MJ/kg292,348 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

46 kg CO₂/kg
44 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb
480 L/kg57.5 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

111 kN·m/kg
218 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

856 kJ/m³
3,847 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 3Ti Grade 35

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 3Ti Grade 35
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 3 vs Ti Grade 35 — frequently asked

Is Ti Grade 35 stronger than Grade 3?

Yes. Ti Grade 35 has a typical yield strength of 920 MPa (133 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3 — about 119% more. Tensile strength is 990 MPa (144 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 3 or Ti Grade 35?

Ti Grade 35 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Grade 3 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 3 or Ti Grade 35?

Grade 3. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (18/100) for Ti Grade 35; for welding the order is Grade 3 first (excellent, 85/100) then Ti Grade 35 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 3 and Ti Grade 35 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.