FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 3 vs Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 3 and Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3, about 114% more; tensile strength follows at 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi). In exchange, Grade 3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo, and Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo is harder (310 HB vs 200 HB). Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo is stiffer (120 GPa vs 103 GPa) and Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo runs hotter in service (520°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 3 machines more easily (fair vs poor), Grade 3 welds better (excellent vs good), and Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Grade 3 (specialty, $$$$$).

Grade 3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5MoChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 3 vs Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo: properties

Grade 3Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
10%

Reduction in Area

35%
20%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

24 J17.7 ft·lbf
17 J12.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
330 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
34 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 45 GPa6.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.45 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,620°C2,948 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,668°C3,034 °F
1,680°C3,056 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.4 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
520 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
520°C968 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
17 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
18%

Weldability

85 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

690 MJ/kg296,647 BTU/lb
660 MJ/kg283,749 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

46 kg CO₂/kg
44 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

111 kN·m/kg
231 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

856 kJ/m³
3,375 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 3Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 3Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 3 vs Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo — frequently asked

Is Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo stronger than Grade 3?

Yes. Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3 — about 114% more. Tensile strength is 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 3 or Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo?

Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Grade 3 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 3 or Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo?

Grade 3. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (17/100) for Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo; for welding the order is Grade 3 first (excellent, 85/100) then Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 3 and Ti-6Al-5Zr-0.5Mo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.