FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 3 vs Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 3 and Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn are both titanium grades. Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3, about 145% more; tensile strength follows at 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi). In exchange, Grade 3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 13% for Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn, and Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn is harder (332 HB vs 200 HB). Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn is stiffer (114 GPa vs 103 GPa) and Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn runs hotter in service (425°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 3 machines more easily (fair vs poor), Grade 3 welds better (excellent vs poor), and Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Grade 3 (specialty, $$$$$).

Grade 3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Ti-4Al-4Mo-2SnChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 3 vs Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn: properties

Grade 3Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
114 GPa16.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
108 GPa15.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
13%

Reduction in Area

35%
32%

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
1,080 MPa157 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

24 J17.7 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
332 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
350 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
36 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.6 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,620°C2,948 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,668°C3,034 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.4 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7.1 W/m·K4.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
540 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
425°C797 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
16 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

28%
16%

Weldability

85 / 100
28 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

690 MJ/kg296,647 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

46 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,000 L/kg120 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

111 kN·m/kg
250 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

856 kJ/m³
4,653 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 3Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 3Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
TiAlNYes—
TiB2Yes—
TiCNYes—
TiNYes—
WC/CYes—

They share 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 3 vs Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn — frequently asked

Is Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn stronger than Grade 3?

Yes. Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn has a typical yield strength of 1,030 MPa (149 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for Grade 3 — about 145% more. Tensile strength is 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 500 MPa (72.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 3 or Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn?

Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Grade 3 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 3 or Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn?

Grade 3. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (16/100) for Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn; for welding the order is Grade 3 first (excellent, 85/100) then Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn (poor, 28/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 3 and Ti-4Al-4Mo-2Sn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.