FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 17 vs IMI 685

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 17 and IMI 685 are both titanium grades. IMI 685 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 870 MPa (126 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 17, about 3.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 990 MPa (144 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). In exchange, Grade 17 is the more ductile: elongation 32% versus 11% for IMI 685, and IMI 685 is harder (330 HV vs 125 HV). IMI 685 is stiffer (120 GPa vs 103 GPa) and IMI 685 runs hotter in service (520°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 17 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 17 welds better (excellent vs fair).

Grade 17Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

IMI 685Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 17 vs IMI 685: properties

Grade 17IMI 685

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
990 MPa144 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
870 MPa126 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
11%

Reduction in Area

58%
20%

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
15 J11.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
330 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
33 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 45 GPa6.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.45 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.5 W/m·K10.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
530 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
9.3 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

419 J/g180 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
520°C968 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.3 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.12 V

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
86 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
16%

Weldability

88 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
40 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

900 L/kg108 gal/lb
600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
222 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.8 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

280 kJ/m³
3,154 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.4 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 17IMI 685

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 17IMI 685
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 17 vs IMI 685 — frequently asked

Is IMI 685 stronger than Grade 17?

Yes. IMI 685 has a typical yield strength of 870 MPa (126 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Grade 17 — about 3.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 990 MPa (144 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 17 or IMI 685?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 17 or IMI 685?

Grade 17. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (18/100) for IMI 685; for welding the order is Grade 17 first (excellent, 88/100) then IMI 685 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 17 and IMI 685 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.