FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium Grade 16 vs OT4

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium Grade 16 and OT4 are both titanium grades. OT4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for Grade 16, about 68% more; tensile strength follows at 780 MPa (113 ksi) vs 485 MPa (70.3 ksi). In exchange, Grade 16 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 16% for OT4, and OT4 is harder (240 HB vs 150 HB). OT4 is stiffer (115 GPa vs 105 GPa) and OT4 runs hotter in service (350°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 16 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 16 welds better (excellent vs very good).

Grade 16Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

OT4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 16 vs OT4: properties

Grade 16OT4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

485 MPa70.3 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
16%

Reduction in Area

45%
35%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
240 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
250 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.55 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,620°C2,948 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,670°C3,038 °F
1,665°C3,029 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17 W/m·K9.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.5 W/m·K5.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
540 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

295 J/g127 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
1.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in
1.55×10⁻⁶ Ω·m61 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
25%

Weldability

88 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 620 MJ/kg266,552 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 38 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
171 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

688 kJ/m³
1,781 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.2 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 16OT4

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGrade 16OT4
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

Grade 16 vs OT4 — frequently asked

Is OT4 stronger than Grade 16?

Yes. OT4 has a typical yield strength of 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for Grade 16 — about 68% more. Tensile strength is 780 MPa (113 ksi) vs 485 MPa (70.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Grade 16 or OT4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Grade 16 or OT4?

Grade 16. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (28/100) for OT4; for welding the order is Grade 16 first (excellent, 88/100) then OT4 (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Grade 16 and OT4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.