FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium BT5 vs Grade 16

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium BT5 and Grade 16 are both titanium grades. BT5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 740 MPa (107 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for Grade 16, about 95% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 485 MPa (70.3 ksi). In exchange, Grade 16 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 13% for BT5, and BT5 is harder (265 HB vs 150 HB). BT5 is stiffer (112 GPa vs 105 GPa) and BT5 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 315°C continuous). On the shop floor, Grade 16 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Grade 16 welds better (excellent vs very good).

BT5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Grade 16Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

BT5 vs Grade 16: properties

BT5Grade 16

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

112 GPa16.2 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

108 GPa15.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
485 MPa70.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

740 MPa107 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
28%

Reduction in Area

33%
45%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

265 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

28 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

280 HV
160 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
80 HRB

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.4 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,600°C2,912 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,670°C3,038 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

8.4 W/m·K4.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
17 W/m·K9.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

530 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.8 µm/m·K4.9 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
295 J/g127 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
315°C599 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.1 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m63 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

24 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
35%

Weldability

78 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb
620 MJ/kg266,552 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

46 kg CO₂/kg
38 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

189 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
23.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

2,445 kJ/m³
688 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.6 mm²/s
7.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGrade 16BT5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBT5Grade 16
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

BT5 vs Grade 16 — frequently asked

Is BT5 stronger than Grade 16?

Yes. BT5 has a typical yield strength of 740 MPa (107 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for Grade 16 — about 95% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 485 MPa (70.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, BT5 or Grade 16?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, BT5 or Grade 16?

Grade 16. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (24/100) for BT5; for welding the order is Grade 16 first (excellent, 88/100) then BT5 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in BT5 and Grade 16 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.