Titanium CP-Ti Powder for MIM vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)
Titanium · grade comparison
Titanium CP-Ti Powder for MIM and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) are both titanium grades. Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,040 MPa (151 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for CP-Ti Powder for MIM, about 174% more; tensile strength follows at 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). In exchange, CP-Ti Powder for MIM is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 11% for Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924), and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is harder (340 HB vs 160 HB). Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) is stiffer (113 GPa vs 100 GPa) and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) welds better (65 vs 55 out of 100).
CP-Ti Powder for MIMChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
CP-Ti Powder for MIM vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924): propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all titanium grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all titanium grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
CP-Ti Powder for MIMTi-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Hardness, Rockwell C
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 25%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 10%
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | CP-Ti Powder for MIM | Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.
CP-Ti Powder for MIM vs Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) — frequently asked
Is Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) stronger than CP-Ti Powder for MIM?
Yes. Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) has a typical yield strength of 1,040 MPa (151 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for CP-Ti Powder for MIM — about 174% more. Tensile strength is 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).
Which is cheaper, CP-Ti Powder for MIM or Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, CP-Ti Powder for MIM or Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924)?
CP-Ti Powder for MIM, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 18/100 for Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924); for welding the order is Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) first (good, 65/100) then CP-Ti Powder for MIM (good, 55/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CP-Ti Powder for MIM and Ti-6Al-4V (AM, F2924) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.