FabDigitFabDigit

Steel WC1 vs ZG55SiMnMo

Steel · grade comparison

Steel WC1 and ZG55SiMnMo are both steel grades. ZG55SiMnMo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,600 MPa (232 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, WC1 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 5% for ZG55SiMnMo, and ZG55SiMnMo is harder (460 HB vs 160 HB). WC1 runs hotter in service (455°C vs 350°C continuous) and WC1 conducts electricity better (8.5 % IACS vs 6.2 % IACS). On the shop floor, WC1 machines more easily (good vs poor) and WC1 welds better (very good vs poor).

WC1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ZG55SiMnMoChoose it when strength drives the design.

WC1 vs ZG55SiMnMo: properties

WC1ZG55SiMnMo

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

305 MPa44.2 ksi
1,300 MPa189 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
5%

Reduction in Area

48%
15%

Compressive Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

50 J36.9 ft·lbf
18 J13.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
460 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
480 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
47 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,505°C2,741 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

455°C851 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
6.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in
2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.6 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
15%

Weldability

70 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
205 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

227 kJ/m³
4,122 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
10.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC1ZG55SiMnMo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityWC1ZG55SiMnMo
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

WC1 vs ZG55SiMnMo — frequently asked

Is ZG55SiMnMo stronger than WC1?

Yes. ZG55SiMnMo has a typical yield strength of 1,300 MPa (189 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,600 MPa (232 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, WC1 or ZG55SiMnMo?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, WC1 or ZG55SiMnMo?

WC1. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against poor (15/100) for ZG55SiMnMo; for welding the order is WC1 first (very good, 70/100) then ZG55SiMnMo (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in WC1 and ZG55SiMnMo side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.