FabDigitFabDigit

Steel M4 vs M800-65A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel M4 and M800-65A are both steel grades. M4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M800-65A, about 75% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, M800-65A is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 12% for M4, and M4 is harder (250 HB vs 133 HB). M4 is stiffer (217 GPa vs 205 GPa) and M4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, M800-65A machines more easily (fair vs poor), M800-65A welds better (good vs poor), and M800-65A sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than M4 (specialty, $$$$$).

M4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

M800-65AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

M4 vs M800-65A: properties

M4M800-65A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

217 GPa31.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

84 GPa12.2 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

880 MPa128 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
28%

Reduction in Area

25%
—

Compressive Strength

1,600 MPa232 ksi
—

Shear Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
133 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

265 HV
140 HV

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
74 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.97 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,250°C2,282 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.9 % IACS
8.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.58 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
55%

Weldability

15 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
72 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Polishability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

110 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.2 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

697 kJ/m³
242 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.6 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM4M800-65A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityM4M800-65A
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

M4 vs M800-65A — frequently asked

Is M4 stronger than M800-65A?

Yes. M4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for M800-65A — about 75% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, M4 or M800-65A?

M800-65A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while M4 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, M4 or M800-65A?

M800-65A. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (25/100) for M4; for welding the order is M800-65A first (good, 55/100) then M4 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in M4 and M800-65A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.