FabDigitFabDigit

Steel En18-CD vs En18 QT34-38HRC

Steel · En18 temper comparison

En18-CD and En18 QT34-38HRC are two conditions of the same steel grade, En18: CD (cold drawn) versus QT34-38HRC (Q&T to 34–38 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. En18 QT34-38HRC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) for En18-CD, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). En18 QT34-38HRC is harder — 340 HB against 240 HB for En18-CD — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, En18-CD machines more easily (good vs fair), En18-CD welds better (fair vs poor), and En18-CD forms better (poor vs not recommended).

En18-CDChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

En18 QT34-38HRCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

En18-CD vs En18 QT34-38HRC: properties

En18-CDEn18 QT34-38HRC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

800 MPa116 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

660 MPa95.7 ksi
930 MPa135 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
11%

Reduction in Area

40%
44%

Compressive Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
930 MPa135 ksi

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
545 MPa79 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

240 HB
340 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

22 HRC
36 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

252 HV
358 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 207 GPa30 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42.5 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

380°C716 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
7.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.22×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.74 µΩ·in
2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.62 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

62%
40%

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 33 MJ/kg14,187 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEn18

En18-CD vs En18 QT34-38HRC — frequently asked

Is En18 QT34-38HRC stronger than En18-CD?

Yes. En18 QT34-38HRC has a typical yield strength of 930 MPa (135 ksi) against 660 MPa (95.7 ksi) for En18-CD — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 1,150 MPa (167 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or QT34-38HRC?

T is the default En18 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor QT34-38HRC). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, En18-CD or En18 QT34-38HRC?

En18-CD. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (35/100) for En18 QT34-38HRC; for welding the order is En18-CD first (fair, 35/100) then En18 QT34-38HRC (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in En18-CD and En18 QT34-38HRC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.