FabDigitFabDigit

Steel C5 vs WC1

Steel · grade comparison

Steel C5 and WC1 are both steel grades. C5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1, about 54% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, WC1 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 22% for C5, and C5 is harder (205 HB vs 160 HB). C5 runs hotter in service (620°C vs 455°C continuous) and WC1 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, WC1 machines more easily (good vs fair), WC1 welds better (very good vs fair), and WC1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than C5 (premium, $$$).

C5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

WC1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C5 vs WC1: properties

C5WC1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
28%

Reduction in Area

45%
48%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

310 MPa45 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

35 J25.8 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

205 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

16 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

215 HV
168 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
84 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

620°C1,148 °F
455°C851 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -29°C-20 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
8.5 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.55 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

28 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.7 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

534 kJ/m³
227 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.9 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC1C5

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC5WC1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

C5 vs WC1 — frequently asked

Is C5 stronger than WC1?

Yes. C5 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1 — about 54% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C5 or WC1?

WC1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while C5 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C5 or WC1?

WC1. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for C5; for welding the order is WC1 first (very good, 70/100) then C5 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C5 and WC1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.