FabDigitFabDigit

Steel C12A vs WC1

Steel · grade comparison

Steel C12A and WC1 are both steel grades. C12A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1, about 54% more; tensile strength follows at 650 MPa (94.3 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, WC1 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 21% for C12A, and C12A is harder (215 HB vs 160 HB). C12A is stiffer (218 GPa vs 205 GPa) and C12A runs hotter in service (600°C vs 455°C continuous). On the shop floor, WC1 machines more easily (good vs fair), WC1 welds better (very good vs fair), and WC1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than C12A (premium, $$$).

C12AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

WC1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C12A vs WC1: properties

C12AWC1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

218 GPa31.6 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

84 GPa12.2 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

650 MPa94.3 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

21%
28%

Reduction in Area

58%
48%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

295 MPa42.8 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

215 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

19 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

225 HV
168 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
84 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.77 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

600°C1,112 °F
455°C851 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-29°C-20 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.9 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

33 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Weldability

38 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

33 MJ/kg14,187 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

84 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.1 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

507 kJ/m³
227 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.3 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC1C12A

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC12AWC1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

C12A vs WC1 — frequently asked

Is C12A stronger than WC1?

Yes. C12A has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1 — about 54% more. Tensile strength is 650 MPa (94.3 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C12A or WC1?

WC1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while C12A is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C12A or WC1?

WC1. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (42/100) for C12A; for welding the order is WC1 first (very good, 70/100) then C12A (fair, 38/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C12A and WC1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.