FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A514 vs EN9

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A514 and EN9 are both steel grades. A514 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for EN9, about 124% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). A514 is the more ductile: elongation 19% versus 16% for EN9, and A514 is harder (250 HB vs 187 HB). A514 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and EN9 conducts heat better (49 W/m·K vs 42 W/m·K). On the shop floor, EN9 machines more easily (50 vs 38 out of 100), A514 welds better (good vs fair), and EN9 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A514 (standard, $$).

A514Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EN9Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A514 vs EN9: properties

A514EN9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

800 MPa116 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

760 MPa110 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

19%
16%

Reduction in Area

50%
40%

Compressive Strength

760 MPa110 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
187 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

262 HV
196 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
49 W/m·K28.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-45°C-49 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.45 µΩ·in
1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.62 V

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
55%

Weldability

55 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,409 kJ/m³
279 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
13 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA514EN9

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA514EN9
Default conditionQ&THR
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A514 vs EN9 — frequently asked

Is A514 stronger than EN9?

Yes. A514 has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for EN9 — about 124% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A514 or EN9?

EN9 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A514 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A514 or EN9?

EN9, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 38/100 for A514; for welding the order is A514 first (good, 55/100) then EN9 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A514 and EN9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.