FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A514 vs EN31

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A514 and EN31 are both steel grades. A514 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for EN31, about 81% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, EN31 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 19% for A514, and A514 is harder (250 HB vs 195 HB). A514 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 150°C continuous) and EN31 conducts electricity better (7.8 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, A514 welds better (good vs poor) and EN31 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than A514 (standard, $$).

A514Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

EN31Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A514 vs EN31: properties

A514EN31

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

800 MPa116 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

760 MPa110 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

19%
25%

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Compressive Strength

760 MPa110 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
195 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

262 HV
205 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.81 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,424°C2,595 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,455°C2,651 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-45°C-49 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.45 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 40% · Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

102 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,409 kJ/m³
420 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.4 mm²/s
12.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
13

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA514EN31

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA514EN31
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionQ&T—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A514 vs EN31 — frequently asked

Is A514 stronger than EN31?

Yes. A514 has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for EN31 — about 81% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A514 or EN31?

EN31 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while A514 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A514 or EN31?

EN31, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for A514; for welding the order is A514 first (good, 55/100) then EN31 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A514 and EN31 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.