FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A232-CD vs A232 QT-36-40HRC

Steel · A232 temper comparison

A232-CD and A232 QT-36-40HRC are two conditions of the same steel grade, A232: CD (cold drawn) versus QT-36-40HRC. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. A232 QT-36-40HRC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,160 MPa (168 ksi) against 980 MPa (142 ksi) for A232-CD, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 1,150 MPa (167 ksi). A232 QT-36-40HRC is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 8% for A232-CD, and A232 QT-36-40HRC is harder (38 HRC vs 36 HRC). A232 QT-36-40HRC runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, A232-CD machines more easily (fair vs poor).

A232-CDChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

A232 QT-36-40HRCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A232-CD vs A232 QT-36-40HRC: properties

A232-CDA232 QT-36-40HRC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

206 GPa29.9 Msi
207 GPa30 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,150 MPa167 ksi
1,275 MPa185 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

980 MPa142 ksi
1,160 MPa168 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
13%

Reduction in Area

35%
50%

Shear Strength

690 MPa100 ksi
1,050 MPa152 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

340 HB
355 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

36 HRC
38 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

355 HV
520 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 79.3 GPa11.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.5 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.06 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
32%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.3 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA232

A232-CD vs A232 QT-36-40HRC — frequently asked

Is A232 QT-36-40HRC stronger than A232-CD?

Yes. A232 QT-36-40HRC has a typical yield strength of 1,160 MPa (168 ksi) against 980 MPa (142 ksi) for A232-CD — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 1,275 MPa (185 ksi) vs 1,150 MPa (167 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or QT-36-40HRC?

OT is the default A232 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor QT-36-40HRC). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, A232-CD or A232 QT-36-40HRC?

A232-CD. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (20/100) for A232 QT-36-40HRC; for welding the order is A232-CD first (poor, 25/100) then A232 QT-36-40HRC (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A232-CD and A232 QT-36-40HRC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.