FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A2 vs A9

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A2 and A9 are both steel grades. A2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A9, about 18% more. A2 runs hotter in service (425°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, A9 machines more easily (good vs fair), A9 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and A2 forms better (fair vs poor).

A2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

A9Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

A2 vs A9: properties

A2A9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

203 GPa29.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

740 MPa107 ksi
745 MPa108 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Compressive Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

217 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
97 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 78 GPa11.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Elongation at Break 22% · Reduction in Area 45% · Shear Strength 450 MPa65.3 ksi · Hardness, Vickers 230 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,465°C2,669 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.7 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
18 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.58 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
45%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb
70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

94 kN·m/kg
96 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

544 kJ/m³
400 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.2 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA2A9

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA2A9
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A2 vs A9 — frequently asked

Is A2 stronger than A9?

Yes. A2 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A9 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 740 MPa (107 ksi) vs 745 MPa (108 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A2 or A9?

A2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while A9 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A2 or A9?

A9. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for A2; for welding the order is A9 first (poor, 30/100) then A2 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A2 and A9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.