FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 8625 vs SCM415

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 8625 and SCM415 are both steel grades. SCM415 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for 8625, about 8% more. On the shop floor, 8625 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SCM415 (standard, $$).

8625Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

SCM415Choose it when strength drives the design.

8625 vs SCM415: properties

8625SCM415

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
22%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

285 MPa41.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

187 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

91 HRB
89 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

196 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55% · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.61 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 60% · Weldability 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
50 L/kg6 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 27 MJ/kg11,608 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
82 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

390 kJ/m³
449 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.8 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSCM4158625

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability8625SCM415
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

8625 vs SCM415 — frequently asked

Is SCM415 stronger than 8625?

Yes. SCM415 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for 8625 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 8625 or SCM415?

8625 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SCM415 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 8625 over SCM415?

Pick 8625 when cost is the deciding factor. Pick SCM415 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 8625 and SCM415 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.