FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 4150 vs 8650

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 4150 and 8650 are both steel grades, both high strength steel. 8650 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 4150, about 6% more. 8650 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 16% for 4150, and 8650 is harder (250 HB vs 235 HB). On the shop floor, 8650 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 4150 (premium, $$$).

8650Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

4150 vs 8650: properties

41508650

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
18%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
22 J16.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
24 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

245 HV
262 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 860 MPa125 ksi · Reduction in Area 40% · Shear Strength 560 MPa81.2 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,416°C2,581 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.62 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
42 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
55%

Weldability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
29 MJ/kg12,468 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
50 L/kg6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Modulus of Resilience

660 kJ/m³
738 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
12.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 110 kN·m/kg · Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale41508650

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability41508650
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

4150 vs 8650 — frequently asked

Is 8650 stronger than 4150?

Yes. 8650 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 4150 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 860 MPa (125 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4150 or 8650?

8650 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 4150 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 4150 over 8650?

Pick 8650 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4150 and 8650 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.