FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 4150 vs 8642

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 4150 and 8642 are both steel grades. 8642 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,020 MPa (148 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 4150, about 96% more; tensile strength follows at 1,130 MPa (164 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi). 8642 is harder — 320 HB against 235 HB for 4150 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 8642 welds better (fair vs poor) and 8642 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4150 (premium, $$$).

8642Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

4150 vs 8642: properties

41508642

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

860 MPa125 ksi
1,130 MPa164 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,020 MPa148 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
15%

Reduction in Area

40%
52%

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
320 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
34 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

245 HV
335 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,416°C2,581 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
55%

Weldability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

31 MJ/kg13,328 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

110 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

660 kJ/m³
2,538 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
11.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
20

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale41508642

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability41508642
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

4150 vs 8642 — frequently asked

Is 8642 stronger than 4150?

Yes. 8642 has a typical yield strength of 1,020 MPa (148 ksi) against 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) for 4150 — about 96% more. Tensile strength is 1,130 MPa (164 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4150 or 8642?

8642 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4150 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 4150 or 8642?

8642, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 4150; for welding the order is 8642 first (fair, 35/100) then 4150 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4150 and 8642 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.